Tianjin Jintong Power Iron Tower Manufacture Co., Ltd.
Tianjin Jintong Power Iron Tower Manufacture Co., Ltd.
13821566236@163.com

What Is the Difference Between a Tubular Tower and a Lattice Tower?

Table of Content [Hide]

    In the global power transmission, communication, and renewable energy sectors, tower design plays a critical role in project efficiency, logistics, and long-term O&M costs. Among the most common tower types are tubular towers and lattice towers—each with distinct structural, technical, and commercial characteristics.

    As industry professionals and procurement leaders know, choosing the right tower type is not just a matter of aesthetics or price, but one of engineering performance, project scope, and lifecycle optimization. Let’s break down the key differences to help you make informed sourcing decisions.

    1. Structural Design Philosophy

    Tubular Towers

    Tubular towers—also known as monopoles—are typically fabricated from hot-dip galvanized steel tubes, either in tapered or multi-sectioned segments. Their structure is solid, sleek, and vertically integrated, making them ideal for urban environments or space-constrained areas.

    Lattice Towers

    Lattice towers are assembled from multiple angular steel profiles, bolted or welded together in a truss-like framework. This structure distributes loads across multiple members, providing high strength-to-weight ratios and excellent performance in long-span transmission lines or harsh terrains.

    2. Fabrication and Assembly

    Tubular Towers

    • Manufactured using bending and welding processes.

    • Typically pre-fabricated in sections at the factory.

    • Faster to erect on-site (minimal bolting required).

    • Lower labor intensity during installation.

    Lattice Towers

    • Composed of hundreds of individual steel members.

    • More flexible for transport in remote or mountainous areas.

    • Require skilled assembly crews for on-site bolting.

    • Longer installation times, especially for tall or custom configurations.

    3. Strength and Load Capacity

    • Lattice towers generally offer higher load-bearing capacity, making them suitable for multi-circuit power lines, heavy communication equipment, or severe wind/ice zones.

    • Tubular towers provide adequate strength for medium loads but may require larger diameters or higher wall thickness for demanding applications, increasing cost and logistical burden.

    4. Footprint and Aesthetics

    FeatureTubular TowerLattice Tower

    Footprint

    Small (ideal for cities)

    Large (requires open land)

    Visual Impact

    Minimalistic, modern

    Industrial, functional

    Urban Approval

    Easier due to aesthetics

    More difficult in urban zones

    • In urban power lines, street lighting, or telecom applications, tubular towers are often preferred for visual appeal and smaller ground coverage.

    • Lattice towers are more common in rural or intercity transmission lines, where aesthetics are less critical than functionality and cost-efficiency.

    5. Logistics and Transport Considerations

    Tubular Towers

    • Bulkier, especially in large sizes.

    • Require flatbed trucks or special permits for oversized loads.

    • May present challenges in mountainous or remote regions.

    Lattice Towers

    • Easier to pack and transport in containers or bundled sections.

    • Better suited for international shipping and off-grid projects.

    6. Maintenance and Long-Term Durability

    • Tubular structures are more resistant to corrosion and rust, especially when hot-dip galvanized with proper interior coatings. Their smooth surface also discourages bird nesting and dirt accumulation.

    • Lattice towers, with more connections and angular members, require more regular inspections and are more prone to corrosion at bolt joints and crevices.

    7. Cost Comparison

    CategoryTubular TowerLattice Tower

    Material Cost

    Higher (more steel per unit)

    Lower (efficient steel use)

    Manufacturing Cost

    Higher (welding, shaping)

    Lower (angle steel is standard)

    Installation Cost

    Lower (faster, less labor)

    Higher (bolting, skilled labor)

    Maintenance Cost

    Lower

    Higher (frequent inspections)

    Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) should be analyzed case-by-case, depending on:

    • Project size

    • Site location

    • Transport infrastructure

    • Local labor costs

    8. Application Scenarios

    ApplicationRecommended Tower Type

    Urban transmission lines

    Tubular

    High-voltage, long-span lines

    Lattice

    Mountainous or remote terrains

    Lattice

    Street lighting / 5G poles

    Tubular

    Wind-prone or coastal areas

    Depends on wind load & foundation

    9. Standards & Customization

    • Lattice towers offer more flexibility in customized heights and span requirements. They comply with IEC, ASTM, and national grid specifications globally.

    • Tubular towers are also standardized but may require custom tooling for non-standard heights or special cross-arms.

    Conclusion: Which Tower Should You Choose?

    Ultimately, the choice between tubular towers and lattice towers should be driven by technical performance, logistics feasibility, and project-specific constraints.

    • Choose tubular towers if you need:

      • Clean appearance in urban settings

      • Fast installation and lower maintenance

      • Compact footprint

    • Choose lattice towers if you need:

      • High structural capacity

      • Better transportability for remote sites

      • Lower initial material cost

    At Jintong Towers, we specialize in both custom-engineered lattice towers and high-precision tubular structures, backed by decades of fabrication and export experience. If you're unsure which solution fits your project best, our engineering and sales teams are ready to assist with tailored recommendations and quotes.


    References